OIMAP Review

The committee brings together academics, lawyers, curators and practitioners from several countries. Each article is read anonymously by two reviewers, who provide detailed comments.

The final decision rests with the editorial board. Authors receive a reasoned reply within about eight weeks.

Each issue includes a thematic dossier, studies outside the dossier, a legal column, reading notes and an interview with a personality from the sector.

A "Field" section gives practitioners a voice, in a freer form than the scholarly article.

Proposals are sent electronically, accompanied by a 200-word abstract. Full texts run between 25,000 and 45,000 characters. A style sheet can be downloaded online.

Calls for contributions are published for each dossier. Authors retain their rights and grant the Review a publication licence.

Abstracts and editorials are open access. The full text is reserved for subscribers, with reduced rates for students and public institutions. Issues more than three years old become open access.

Subscribers also receive an alert with each issue.

All issues are archived with a stable identifier and a searchable table of contents. An index by author and by theme facilitates searching.

Special issues accompany the Organisation's key moments, such as the General Assembly.