2024 in brief

2024 was a record year for the TAO: 212 requests registered, 169 awards made, a mediation agreement rate of 66% and voluntary compliance at 81%. The revised Rules came into force on 1 January, with the online request and a new scale of fees.
The full sixty-four-page report is available as a PDF. This page presents its main lessons.
Detailed figures can be found in the TAO statistics section.
Annual report of the tribunal in figures
Source: Registry of the OIMAP Arbitral Tribunal.
Highlights
Online filing was adopted by 98% of claimants. Remote hearings accounted for 48% of the total. The tribunal welcomed 12 new arbitrators and 6 mediators, bringing the lists to 142 and 36. Three bilateral cooperation agreements on restitution were concluded.
The quality committee recommended continuing the effort to reduce time limits and strengthening financial assistance for small parties, for which the ceiling was raised to 50% of costs.



Performance and quality
The average duration of a case remained at eleven months. The average time between closure and award was 45 days. The expedited procedure took 5.8 months on average. The rate of voluntary compliance rose by two points.
The satisfaction survey shows that 92% of parties say they are satisfied or very satisfied, notably with the quality of the arbitrators (95%) and the clarity of the procedure (91%). The points for improvement concern cost (68%) and the time taken to constitute the tribunal.
Finances and outlook
The tribunal's budget is balanced by registration fees and administrative costs. Funding assistance benefited 31 parties for a total of €187,000. No OIMAP funding is needed for the tribunal's day-to-day running, which guarantees its independence.
The 2025 objectives include the consolidation of multiple proceedings, publication of guidelines on third-party funding of disputes and the launch of an online mediation platform.
Acknowledgements and governance
The report pays tribute to the arbitrators, mediators, experts and staff of the Registry. It also presents the composition of the council, the committees and the rules of governance. The council met six times and held an extraordinary session devoted to the revision of the Rules.
Finally, it recalls the institution's ethical commitments: independence, transparency, combating conflicts of interest and respect for diversity.
Key figures 2024
| Indicator | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Requests | 188 | 212 |
| Awards | 151 | 169 |
| Mediations | 41 | 47 |
| Satisfaction | 90% | 92% |
Milestones
- Entry into force
2024 Rules.
- Online request
Rollout.
- New arbitrators
Twelve names.
- Bilateral agreements
Three signed.
- Review
212 requests.
A verified report



Read the full report or the summary

Full report
64 pages- Detailed figures
- Accounts
- Annexes
For practitioners.

Summary
6 pages- Main figures
- Highlights
- Outlook
For a quick read.
Using the report
- Download
PDF.
- Read
Summary.
- Extract
Figures.
- Compare
Previous years.
- React
Contact the Registry.
Figures to remember
The president

« A tribunal should be judged on its results and on the satisfaction of its users. This report is the measure of it. »
Vocabulary of the report
- Independent auditor
- External auditor of the accounts.
- Financial assistance
- Reduction of costs for small parties.
- Mediation platform
- Online service for mediations.
- Third-party funding
- Payment of the costs of a dispute by a third party.
Frequently asked questions
When is it published?
In March each year.
Is it translated?
Yes, three languages.
Are the accounts public?
Yes, in the report.
Where can I see previous years?
See Archives.
Useful documents
Contacts

See the archives
Image credits (16)
- The Calumny of Apelles, Giorgio Ghisi (1560) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- The Victory Banquet: from Battle Scenes of the Quelling of Rebellions in the Western Regions, with Imperial Poems (c. 1765–74; poem dated 1760) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Dr. James Stuart; Mary Campbell Stuart, Gilbert Stuart (c. 1815) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Fish or Seal Club (X’ús’) (late 1800s–early 1900s) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- The Judgment of Solomon and Esther before Ahasuerus (pair), Dirk Vellert (c. 1530) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Portrait of John VIII Palaoelogus, Emperor of Constantinople, 1424-1428 (reverse), Pisanello (c. 1438–1439) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Sketches in Belgium and Germany, Volume I: Hall of Justice of the Magistrates du Franc, Bruges, Louis Haghe (1840) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Teapot with Landscape and Imperial Poem, Chen Hanwen (1762–95) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- The Antechamber of the Palace of Justice, Paris, Charles Meryon (1855) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- The Dance at the Court of Herod, Israhel van Meckenem (c. 1500) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Coronation of the Virgin, Christoffel Jegher (1632–36) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- The Old Market, Cleveland, Frank Wilcox (1920) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Sweet Melancholy, Joseph-Marie Vien (1756) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Seal of Doge Michele Steno (reverse) (1400–1409) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Letter Box, Ogata Kōrin (1700s) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Document Box (Ryōshibako) with Chrysanthemum and Plum (lid) (late 1800s-early 1900s) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
Cleveland Museum of Art · CC0 1.0
Tribunal reportsAnnual report, thematic studies and archives: the public memory of the TAO's activity.›
Tribunal studiesTwenty-three thematic studies on time limits, authenticity, restitution, technology and diversity in art arbitration.›
Tribunal archivesReports, rules, studies and press releases published since 2011: the public memory of the TAO.›