Time as a stake

In arbitration as elsewhere, losing time often means losing money. The TAO Rules devote a chapter to time limits: some are fixed, others set by the tribunal, all can be arranged with discipline.
The average duration of a case is eleven months, with variations according to complexity. The maximum time limits aim to prevent a procedure from dragging on.
This page presents the key time limits, the rules on extension and their consequences.
Time limits of the procedure in figures
Source: Registry of the OIMAP Arbitral Tribunal.
Time limits set by the Rules
The Registry checks admissibility within five working days. The respondent answers within thirty days. The parties appoint the arbitrators within thirty days of the answer. Objections to an arbitrator are made within fifteen days. The award is made within sixty days of the close of the debates.
These time limits are mandatory: exceeding them has consequences, notably the appointment of an arbitrator by default or continuation of the proceedings without the defaulting party.



Time limits set by the tribunal
For briefs, replies, documents and the hearing, the tribunal sets the dates at the first meeting, after consulting the parties. It takes account of the complexity of the case, the need for expert evidence and availability.
A typical time limit is eight weeks for an initial brief, four weeks for a reply, and three months between the close of written pleadings and the hearing. The tribunal may shorten them for urgent disputes.
Extensions and sanctions
An extension may be requested before the deadline, with a serious reason: illness, unavailability of a witness, unforeseen complexity. It is granted by the tribunal, generally for fifteen to thirty days, and may be renewed only exceptionally.
In the event of unjustified overrun, the tribunal may disregard the document, rule on the elements available and take the delay into account in allocating costs. Failure to answer is not an admission: the tribunal examines the claim on its merits.
Time limits and court vacations
The TAO has no judicial vacations, but the Registry takes into account closure periods announced in advance and the parties' religious holidays. A request for postponement on this ground is generally accepted if made at the first meeting.
Time zones are taken into account: a document is deemed filed at Paris time. The Desk shows the deadline in each party's local time to avoid mistakes.
Main time limits
| Act | Time limit | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| Admissibility | 5 working days | Registry |
| Answer | 30 days | Respondent |
| Appointment of arbitrators | 30 days | Parties |
| Objection to an arbitrator | 15 days | Parties |
| Award | 60 days | Tribunal |
Milestones
- Initial rules
Indicative time limits.
- Binding time limits
Ceiling for the award.
- Expedited procedure
Six months.
- Online timetable
Automatic reminders.
Time limits run in calendar days



Extension or acceleration

Extension
Lengthens the time limit- Useful in the event of the unforeseen
- Delays the award
- To be requested before the deadline
Exceptional.

Acceleration
Shortens time limits- Faster award
- Lower costs
- Concentrated workload
Possible by agreement.
Keeping to time limits
- Note
Carry over the dates.
- Plan
Plan the documents.
- Warn
Flag a risk early.
- Apply
Request a reasoned extension.
- Deliver
File before the deadline.
Good management rules
A lawyer

« The classic mistake is to discover the deadline the day before. A timetable shared with the Registry avoids it. »
Vocabulary of time limits
- Extension
- Additional time granted.
- Notification
- Official act of notification.
- Foreclosure
- Loss of a right through failure to act in time.
- Working day
- Day on which the Registry works.
Frequently asked questions
Are time limits suspended in August?
No, but the tribunal takes this into account.
Can more time be had?
Yes, by reasoned extension.
What happens if I miss a time limit?
The tribunal may disregard the late act.
Where can I see the hearing?
See Hearings.
Useful documents
Contacts

Preparing the hearing
Image credits (16)
- Dr. James Stuart; Mary Campbell Stuart, Gilbert Stuart (c. 1815) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- The Victory Banquet: from Battle Scenes of the Quelling of Rebellions in the Western Regions, with Imperial Poems (c. 1765–74; poem dated 1760) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- The Calumny of Apelles, Giorgio Ghisi (1560) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Letter Box, Ogata Kōrin (1700s) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- The Judgment of Solomon and Esther before Ahasuerus (pair), Dirk Vellert (c. 1530) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Portrait of John VIII Palaoelogus, Emperor of Constantinople, 1424-1428 (reverse), Pisanello (c. 1438–1439) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- The Antechamber of the Palace of Justice, Paris, Charles Meryon (1855) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Sweet Melancholy, Joseph-Marie Vien (1756) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Sketches in Belgium and Germany, Volume I: Hall of Justice of the Magistrates du Franc, Bruges, Louis Haghe (1840) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- The Dance at the Court of Herod, Israhel van Meckenem (c. 1500) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Coronation of the Virgin, Christoffel Jegher (1632–36) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- A Palace with an Arched Bridge (A Roman Villa), Hubert Robert (1760) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Plaque (1500s–1600s) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Teapot with Landscape and Imperial Poem, Chen Hanwen (1762–95) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Seal Color Box (1662–1722) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Seal of Doge Michele Steno (reverse) (1400–1409) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
Cleveland Museum of Art · CC0 1.0
Arbitration procedureFrom request to award: the stages, time limits and hearings of an arbitration before the TAO, with a typical eleven-month timetable.›
Stages of arbitrationSeven stages from request to award: content of each act, responsibilities and points to watch.›
Arbitration hearingsPreparation, conduct and organisation of TAO hearings, on site or remotely: witnesses, experts, interpreters and confidentiality.›