Observe · Regulate · Protect — since 2007. 19th OIMAP General Assembly: Singapore, 10–12 June 2026. Programme
Protection

Request a restitution

How to submit a case: who can request, conditions, documents to supply, process, costs and remedies.

Updated : October 28, 2026· 4 min read

Submitting your request

Figurine (300–100 BCE)
Figurine (300–100 BCE)

A museum, a State, a community, a family or a rights holder may ask OIMAP for help in obtaining the restitution of property. The request is made on the Desk, in a structured file that allows a swift investigation.

The procedure is free. Only possible appraisal and transport costs are to be shared between the parties according to the agreement. The restitutions unit acknowledges receipt within five days and decides on admissibility within thirty days.

This page explains the conditions, the documents to supply and the process.

  • Request
  • File
  • Procedure

Requesting a restitution in figures

30 dTime to decide on admissibility
€0Filing fees
5 dTime to acknowledge receipt
14 monthsAverage duration of the case

Source: OIMAP Heritage Protection Department.

Breakdown

Museums and institutions34%
States28%
Families and rights holders26%
Communities12%

Applicants in 2024.

Who can apply

Those who may request a restitution are the owners of the work (persons or institutions), their rights holders, States or public authorities when the property belongs to the public domain or national heritage, and communities whose tradition establishes the link with the object.

The request must concern an identified or identifiable work, and rely on a precise fact: theft, looting, spoliation, illicit export. The unit refers applicants whose situation falls under another procedure.

Mother and Child Figure (late 1800s–early 1900s)
Mother and Child Figure (late 1800s–early 1900s)
Portrait of John VIII Palaoelogus, Emperor of Constantinople, 1424-1428 (reverse), Pisanello (c. 1438–1439)
Portrait of John VIII Palaoelogus, Emperor of Constantinople, 1424-1428 (reverse), Pisanello (c. 1438–1439)
Male Figure (late 1800s-early 1900s)
Male Figure (late 1800s-early 1900s)

Documents to supply

The file comprises a description of the work with photographs, proof of ownership or the link with the applicant, an account of the circumstances of the disappearance, existing reports and records, the identity and supposed location of the holder, and an indication of the solution sought.

It is not necessary to gather everything on filing: the file can be supplemented during the investigation. But the more complete it is, the faster the admissibility decision. The unit helps to look for missing documents, notably in archives.

What one can expect

The unit can propose mediation between the applicant and the holder, organise an independent appraisal, facilitate exchanges with the authorities, or refer to the Arbitral Tribunal. It imposes no solution: the agreement belongs to the parties.

The applicant remains free to go to the national courts at any time, and the OIMAP procedure does not interrupt limitation periods. It is therefore prudent to consult a lawyer from the start.

Specific support

For communities without legal resources, OIMAP provides enhanced support: help with drafting, use of volunteer experts, funding of part of the costs. These schemes are backed by the Protection Fund.

For States, the unit works with embassies and culture ministries so that the request fits with any diplomatic steps. Close coordination avoids contradictory messages.

Request file

Five essential documents
DocumentPurposePriority
Description and photographsIdentify the workMandatory
Proof of ownershipEstablish the rightMandatory
Circumstances of the disappearanceCharacterise the factMandatory
Police reportsSupport the requestRecommended
Identity of the holderContactUseful

Landmarks

  1. Filing

    Online file.

  2. Acknowledgement of receipt

    Case handler designated.

  3. Admissibility

    Reasoned decision.

  4. Investigation

    Experts, documents.

  5. Negotiation

    Meetings.

Limitation periods keep running

Panel (c. 1780–1840)
Panel (c. 1780–1840)
Beaded Hat or Headpiece (early 1900s(?))
Beaded Hat or Headpiece (early 1900s(?))
Double-Sided Votive Relief (305–30 BCE)
Double-Sided Votive Relief (305–30 BCE)

Request by a private individual or by an institution

Coronet (oríkògbófo) (1900s)

Private individual

Family, rights holder
  • Needs support
  • Proof of family link
  • Support from the unit

Enhanced help.

The Victory Banquet: from Battle Scenes of the Quelling of Rebellions in the Western Regions, with Imperial Poems (c. 1765–74; poem dated 1760)

Institution

Museum, State
  • More structured file
  • Diplomatic relay possible
  • Faster procedure

Institutional support.

Submitting a request

  1. Prepare

    Gather the documents.

  2. Create

    Open an account on the Desk.

  3. Complete

    Fill in the form.

  4. Send

    Submit the file.

  5. Follow up

    Answer the unit.

Before filing

A rights holder

Necklace (ashän ketab) with amulet pendants (tälsäm) and bead (late 1800s or early 1900s)
« Without the unit's help we could never have traced the painting. It guided us through the archives and to the holder. »
Irène Danglard, rights holder

Vocabulary of the request

Applicant
Person who requests a restitution.
Limitation period
Time after which an action is no longer possible.
Admissibility
Conformity of a request with the rules.
Holder
Person who currently possesses the property.

Frequently asked questions

What is the average duration?

Fourteen months.

Is a lawyer needed?

Not necessarily, but it is advisable.

Is the request confidential?

Yes.

Where do I open a case?

On the Desk, Restitutions section.

Useful documents

Contacts

A Palace with an Arched Bridge (A Roman Villa), Hubert Robert (1760)
A Palace with an Arched Bridge (A Roman Villa), Hubert Robert (1760)
Heritage Protection DepartmentParis — Headquarters+33 1 00 00 03 00protection@oimap.exampleMonday to Friday, 9 am – 5 pm

See the ongoing cases

Edge of the Woods Near L'Hermitage, Pontoise, Camille Pissarro (1879)

Understanding the steps.

Ongoing cases
Image credits (16)
▲