Four families of disputes

TAO cases fall into four families corresponding to the four chambers: contracts, authenticity, provenance and restitution. Each has its characteristics: duration, cost, mediation rate, most frequent outcome.
The figures on this page relate to 2024 and to the period 2015-2024. They are aggregated to guarantee confidentiality.
For each family, see the dedicated section: contracts, authenticity, provenance, restitution.
Cases by type of dispute in figures
Source: Registry of the OIMAP Arbitral Tribunal.
Durations compared
Contract disputes are the fastest (eight months on average), thanks to the expedited procedure. Authenticity disputes last nine months, including the appraisal. Provenance disputes reach fourteen months because of archival research, and restitution disputes seventeen months, because of their complexity and the participation of States.
The gaps are larger depending on whether the tribunal has one or three arbitrators and whether the parties use mediation or not.



Outcomes and mediation
For contracts, 52% of disputes are settled before the hearing, often by mediation (70% agreements). In authenticity, 48% of claims are upheld in whole or in part. In provenance, 44% of cases end in an amicable agreement, and in restitution 58%.
Mediation is therefore very effective in disputes where a lasting relationship or a symbolic dimension is at stake, that is, in restitution and provenance.
Evolution since 2015
The share of contract disputes rose from 24% to 33%, with the spread of the standard clause. The share of authenticity remains stable, while restitution doubled (from 7% to 14%), driven by the engagement of States and museums. Provenance disputes are stabilising at around 22%.
This development encourages the tribunal to strengthen its skills in international law and intercultural mediation.
Special cases and amounts
Amounts vary by family: median of €150,000 for contracts, €320,000 for authenticity, €600,000 for provenance. Restitutions often concern property of great cultural rather than financial value, which makes the measure of the amount less relevant.
Mixed cases (for example a sale whose authenticity is contested) are classified according to the main object of the claim. The tribunal may entrust them to a panel combining several chambers.
Comparison by family
| Family | Average duration | Amicable agreements |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts | 8 months | 52% |
| Authenticity | 9 months | 38% |
| Provenance | 14 months | 44% |
| Restitution | 17 months | 58% |
Milestones
- Contracts 24%
Initial share.
- Restitution 9%
Rise.
- Authenticity 31%
Stable.
- Contracts 33%
First family.
Anticipating according to your dispute



Simple or complex dispute

Simple
Contract, limited amount- Expedited procedure
- Six to eight months
- Reduced cost
Majority case.

Complex
Provenance, restitution- In-depth investigation
- Fourteen to seventeen months
- Experts and archives
Minority case.
Situating your dispute
- Qualify
Family.
- Consult
Dedicated section.
- Estimate
Duration and cost.
- Choose
Mediation or arbitration.
- Prepare
File.
Questions to ask
A legal director

« Knowing that 70% of contract disputes are settled in mediation decided us to try it. We have not regretted it. »
Vocabulary of disputes
- Family of disputes
- Category of cases.
- Chamber
- Specialised panel of the tribunal.
- Agreement rate
- Share of cases settled by agreement.
- Share
- Proportion of the total.
Frequently asked questions
Which family is fastest?
Contract disputes.
Why is restitution long?
Complexity and participation of States.
May I consult the decisions?
Yes, in the database.
Where can I see the decisions?
See Case law.
Useful documents
Contacts

Consult the case law
Image credits (16)
- Dr. James Stuart; Mary Campbell Stuart, Gilbert Stuart (c. 1815) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Portrait of John VIII Palaoelogus, Emperor of Constantinople, 1424-1428 (reverse), Pisanello (c. 1438–1439) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- The Calumny of Apelles, Giorgio Ghisi (1560) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Plaque (1500s–1600s) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- The Antechamber of the Palace of Justice, Paris, Charles Meryon (1855) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- The Victory Banquet: from Battle Scenes of the Quelling of Rebellions in the Western Regions, with Imperial Poems (c. 1765–74; poem dated 1760) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Sketches in Belgium and Germany, Volume I: Hall of Justice of the Magistrates du Franc, Bruges, Louis Haghe (1840) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Seal Color Box (1662–1722) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- The Judgment of Solomon and Esther before Ahasuerus (pair), Dirk Vellert (c. 1530) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Coronation of the Virgin, Christoffel Jegher (1632–36) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- The Dance at the Court of Herod, Israhel van Meckenem (c. 1500) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Eighteen Views of Rome: The Piazza Farnese (recto), Lievin Cruyl (1664) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- The Triumph of Mordecai, Lucas van Leyden (1515) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Seal with Two Qilin Playing (1849) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Letter Box, Ogata Kōrin (1700s) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Seal Color Box (1662–1722) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
Cleveland Museum of Art · CC0 1.0
TAO statisticsThe figures of art arbitration: cases per year, by region and by type of dispute, since the tribunal's creation in 2011.›
Cases per yearEvolution of the number of requests, awards, mediations and durations between 2011 and 2024.›
Arbitral case lawDecision database, search and commentaries: the TAO's anonymised case law, to anticipate the outcome of your own dispute.›