What works in the field

After fifteen years of experience, OIMAP has listed the practices that effectively protect archaeological sites. They rest on a few simple principles: know your site, monitor it, involve the residents and bring it to life.
These practices have been tested on some forty very different sites: desert necropolises, jungle cities, plain tells, decorated caves. They adapt to each context.
This page presents the main measures and examples.
Good practices for protecting sites in figures
Source: OIMAP Heritage Protection Department.
Know and document
The basis of all protection is the inventory: precise location, boundaries, description, condition, photographs, 3D surveys. It makes it possible to know what there is to protect and to spot changes. It also serves as evidence in case of looting, to identify stolen objects.
OIMAP recommends keeping a copy of the inventory outside the country, to guarantee its survival in a crisis. Simple tools, usable on a phone, allow local teams to contribute.



Manage and monitor
A management plan sets the objectives, access rules, works, responsibilities and funding of the site. It is drafted with stakeholders: authorities, researchers, residents, tourism operators. It is revised every five years.
Monitoring combines guarding, patrols, suitable fencing, lighting, cameras and residents' reports. Guards, even more so when recruited locally and trained, are the most effective element of the system.
Involve communities and showcase
Neighbouring communities know the site, are proud of it or fear it. By involving them in management, employing them, passing back to them part of the revenue, they are made the first protectors. Workshops, guided visits and local festivals sustain the link.
Tourism showcasing, well conducted, finances protection: ticketing, shop, accommodation. It must remain moderate, with suitable visitor capacity, so as not to degrade the site. Revenue should benefit the region first.
A network of managers
Site managers form a network run by OIMAP: annual meetings, online exchanges, cross visits. They share their solutions, their mistakes and their tools. This network now has one hundred and forty members in forty countries.
It plays a role of alert and advice: a manager faced with looting can seek the view of a colleague who has been through the same situation.
Twelve recommended practices (extract)
| Practice | Expected effect |
|---|---|
| Shared digital inventory | Evidence, monitoring, restitution |
| Agreed management plan | Consistency of actions |
| Trained local guards | Deterrence, monitoring |
| Sharing in revenue | Local interest in protecting |
| School programme | Raising awareness among the young |
Landmarks
- First projects
Five sites.
- Good practice guide
Publication.
- Guards programme
Training.
- 38 sites
Proven practices.
What works elsewhere must be adapted



Closed protection or open site

Closed
Restricted access- Maximum protection
- Few visitors
- Limited revenue
For fragile sites.

Open
Supervised visits- Revenue and awareness-raising
- Risk of wear
- Requires rigorous management
For robust sites.
Launching a protection plan
- Inventory
Document the site.
- Consult
Involve the stakeholders.
- Draft
Write the management plan.
- Equip
Recruit and train.
- Assess
Measure the results.
Elements of a management plan
A site manager

« Since the village youths became our guards, we have had no more looting. They don't want their history to go away. »
Vocabulary of management
- Management plan
- Document setting out the organisation of a site.
- Inventory
- Detailed list of a heritage.
- Visitor capacity
- Number of visitors that can be borne.
- Stakeholders
- Persons concerned by a project.
Frequently asked questions
Where can I find the guide?
In the useful documents on this page.
Does OIMAP help to draft a plan?
Yes, at a State's request.
How much does a management plan cost?
Depending on the site, from €15,000 to €80,000.
Where can I see the funding?
See Protection Fund.
Useful documents
Contacts

See the Protection Fund
Image credits (16)
- Châteauvieux-sur-Suran, Antoine-Claude Ponthus-Cinier (1848) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Two Boats with Female Mourners (c. 667–647 BCE) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Karnak, Les Pylônes d'Horus, Henri Béchard (1860s) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Landscape, Sōami (early 1500s) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Temple of Athene Nike. Venus Victrix—Wingless Victory, Dimitrios Constantin (c. 1850s–60s) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Talatat: Nefertiti Offers to the Aten (1353–1347 BCE) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- View of the Gulf of Pozzuoli from Solfatara, Philipp Hackert (1803) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Seascape, Henry Ward Ranger (1892) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Egypt & Nubia, Volume III, No. 8: Mosque of Sultan Hassan, Cairo, Louis Haghe (1842–49) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Mit Rahina Ware Vessel (200–100 BCE) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Temple at Naveshera, Kashmir, India, Samuel Bourne (1864) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Roman Ruins, Villa Pamfili, Hubert Robert (1774) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Black-Figure Kantharos (Drinking Cup): Lizards Flanking Tree (A); Ducks (B) (c. 500 BCE) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- A Philosopher, Pierre Puget (1662) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- American Red Cross War Council Medal (obverse), Daniel Chester French (1920) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- The Large Plane Trees (Road Menders at Saint-Rémy), Vincent van Gogh (1889) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
Cleveland Museum of Art · CC0 1.0
Archaeological sitesAgainst looting: satellite monitoring, good management practices and action with the communities that live near sites.›
Archaeological lootingCauses, actors, methods, consequences and responses: understanding the looting of sites in order to fight it better.›
Protection Fund6.8 million euros a year to protect heritage: projects financed, donors, transparency and how to support OIMAP.›