From rule to practice

A directive lays down principles; implementation notes explain how to apply them. They are published by the Secretary-General's Office, after consulting States and professionals, and updated as experience grows.
They create no new obligation, but they reflect the interpretation OIMAP gives to the text. Courts and the Arbitral Tribunal refer to them to assess the proper application of the directive.
This page presents the notes in force, classified by addressee.
The notes in figures
The notes by addressee
| Addressee | Note | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| States | Note 1 | Transposition and calendar |
| States | Note 2 | National register of experts |
| Experts | Note 3 | Drafting the reasoned opinion |
| Experts | Note 4 | Degrees of certainty |
| Laboratories | Note 5 | Protocols and comparisons |
| Laboratories | Note 6 | Sampling and consent |
| Professionals | Note 7 | Due diligence |
| Professionals | Note 8 | Retention of files |
| All | Note 9 | Digital certifications |
| All | Note 10 | Works by living artists |
| All | Note 11 | Conflict zones |
| All | Note 12 | Timeframes and appeals |
For the attention of States
Notes 1 and 2 specify the transposition calendar, the minimum content of national law and the keeping of a register of experts. They recommend the appointment of a focal point and the annual publication of a progress report.
They recall that mutual recognition is an obligation of result: a State may require a new expert assessment only for a specific, notified and proportionate reason.



For the attention of experts
Note 3 details the structure of a reasoned opinion: finding, comparison, analysis, conclusion. Note 4 defines the five degrees of certainty and how to express them unambiguously.
They insist on one point: indeterminacy is not a failure. An expert who cannot conclude must say so, indicating what is missing to do so.
Applying a note to a case
- Identify the question
Which article raises the problem?
- Consult the note
The note associated with the article.
- Apply
Adapt the practice of the case.
- Give reasons
Mention the note in the opinion, where appropriate.
- Report
Refer any difficulty to the Secretariat.
An interpretative value
Binding note or indicative note

Indicative note
General case- Explains the text
- Evolves without formality
- Can be invoked as practice
Most of the notes.

Compliance note
Rare case- Sets a precise threshold or procedure
- Adopted by the certification committee
- Checked during audits
Example: note 8 on retention.
Case study: a note invoked
Consent to sampling
An owner challenges a sample taken without a signed form.
- He invokes note 6 on consent.
- The laboratory acknowledges the omission.
- The analysis is removed from the file.
The case is resumed with a new analysis, at the laboratory's expense.
![Bifolium from a Bible: Initial E[t factum est] with Ezekiel (c. 1290)](/images/bibliotheque/manuscrit/cma135736.webp)


Calendar of the notes
- First series
Notes 1 to 6.
- Second series
Notes 7 to 8.
- Third series
Notes 10 to 11.
- Fourth series
Notes 9 and 12 (digital, timeframes).
A principle of listening

« The notes come from the field: each answers a question that someone has really asked. »
Vocabulary of the notes
- Implementation note
- Explanatory text published by the Secretariat.
- Focal point
- OIMAP's national correspondent.
- Obligation of result
- Obligation to achieve a precise result.
- Proportionate
- Suited to what is at stake.
Frequently asked questions
Are the notes mandatory?
No, but they serve as an interpretative reference.
Where can I consult them?
In the useful documents on this page.
How can I propose a note?
Through the national focal point or the contact form.
Are the notes translated?
Yes, in English and Spanish.
Useful documents
Contacts

Ask a question
Image credits (16)
- Dr. James Stuart; Mary Campbell Stuart, Gilbert Stuart (c. 1815) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Seal of Doge Michele Steno (reverse) (1400–1409) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- The Calumny of Apelles, Giorgio Ghisi (1560) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Illuminated Opening Page Titled Laila and Majnun from a Khamsa (Quintet) of Nizami of Ganja, Ja'far Baisunghuri (835 AH/1431–32 CE) — The Metropolitan Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- The Judgment of Solomon and Esther before Ahasuerus (pair), Dirk Vellert (c. 1530) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Carnet (1863–1865) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- The Antechamber of the Palace of Justice, Paris, Charles Meryon (1855) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Bifolium from a Bible: Initial E[t factum est] with Ezekiel (c. 1290) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Sketches in Belgium and Germany, Volume I: Hall of Justice of the Magistrates du Franc, Bruges, Louis Haghe (1840) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Letter Box, Ogata Kōrin (1700s) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Sweet Melancholy, Joseph-Marie Vien (1756) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Egypt and Nubia, Volume I: The Great Temple of Aboo-Simble, Nubia, Louis Haghe (1846) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- A Manuscript of Five Sections of a Qur'an (18th century) — The Metropolitan Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Portrait of a Man, Nicholas Freese (c. 1795–1800) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Coin of Eukratides I (170–145 BCE) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Seal with Two Qilin Playing (1849) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
Cleveland Museum of Art · CC0 1.0
TextThe five titles and twenty-four articles of Directive No. 2019-07, presented in summary and by theme.›
Code of ethicsThe ten principles binding on accredited experts: independence, impartiality, confidentiality, competence, prudence and transparency.›
CriteriaThe twelve criteria of the conformity label: content, evidence expected and assessment levels.›