Observe · Regulate · Protect — since 2007. 19th OIMAP General Assembly: Singapore, 10–12 June 2026. Programme
Regulation

Monitoring of implementation

OIMAP's annual dashboard: indicators, results by State, ranking of progress and follow-up.

Updated : October 28, 2026· 3 min read

Measuring to progress

Seal of Doge Michele Steno (reverse) (1400–1409)
Seal of Doge Michele Steno (reverse) (1400–1409)

Each year, the Secretariat publishes a monitoring report that measures Member States' progress in applying the conventions and directives. The aim is not to rank in order to sanction, but to understand where support is most needed.

The report relies on twenty indicators, grouped into four dimensions: legal framework, institutions, practices and results. Each State receives an individual sheet, discussed with its focal point before publication.

This page presents the method, recent results and follow-up.

  • Monitoring
  • Indicators
  • Annual report

Monitoring of implementation in figures

20Indicators
4Dimensions
67State sheets
78 / 100Average score in 2024

Source: OIMAP Legal Affairs Department.

Breakdown

Legal framework86 / 100
Institutions79 / 100
Practices72 / 100
Results75 / 100

Average score of Member States by dimension in 2024.

The four dimensions

The legal framework measures the existence and quality of transposition laws. Institutions assess the presence of a supervisory authority, a focal point and human resources. Practices measure training, inventories and cooperation. Finally, results count seizures, restitutions, reports and checks.

Each indicator is scored from 0 to 5 by the Secretariat, on the basis of documents supplied by the State and independent sources. The overall score is the weighted average of the four dimensions.

Coronation of the Virgin, Christoffel Jegher (1632–36)
Coronation of the Virgin, Christoffel Jegher (1632–36)
Nuova pianta di Roma data in luce da Giambattista Nolli l’anno MDCCXLVII, known as La Pianta Grande di Roma, Giovanni Battista Nolli (1748)
Nuova pianta di Roma data in luce da Giambattista Nolli l’anno MDCCXLVII, known as La Pianta Grande di Roma, Giovanni Battista Nolli (1748)
The Victory Banquet: from Battle Scenes of the Quelling of Rebellions in the Western Regions, with Imperial Poems (c. 1765–74; poem dated 1760)
The Victory Banquet: from Battle Scenes of the Quelling of Rebellions in the Western Regions, with Imperial Poems (c. 1765–74; poem dated 1760)

Contrasting progress

The average score rose from 61 in 2020 to 78 in 2024. The clearest progress concerns the legal framework, where almost all States have transposed the directives. Practices progress more slowly, because they depend on resources and training.

Nine States have a score below 50; they are the subject of an action plan agreed with the Secretariat. Fifteen States exceeded 90 and act as sponsors for those making progress.

Follow-up

The monitoring report feeds three processes: individual action plans, decisions on allocating support missions and preparation of revisions of the directives. Recurring findings — for example the weakness of customs officers' training — are turned into general recommendations.

The report is presented each year to the Assembly, which may adopt resolutions. It is also made available to the public, which contributes to the organisation's transparency.

The 2024 results

Four groups of States
Category of StatesNumberScore
Scores above 9015Sponsors
Scores from 70 to 9028Satisfactory progress
Scores from 50 to 7015Progress to be consolidated
Scores below 509Action plan

Landmarks

  1. First report

    Average score of 61.

  2. Individual sheets

    Dialogue with focal points.

  3. Sponsorship

    New scheme.

  4. Average score of 78

    Progress of 17 points.

No public ranking by name

Quantitative or qualitative monitoring

Sweet Melancholy, Joseph-Marie Vien (1756)

Quantitative

Numerical indicators
  • Comparable over time
  • Easy to read
  • Risk of oversimplification

Basis of the report.

Portrait of John VIII Palaoelogus, Emperor of Constantinople, 1424-1428 (reverse), Pisanello (c. 1438–1439)

Qualitative

Interviews and visits
  • Nuanced
  • Understanding of context
  • Longer

Indispensable complement.

Nuova pianta di Roma data in luce da Giambattista Nolli l’anno MDCCXLVII, known as La Pianta Grande di Roma, Giovanni Battista Nolli (1748)
Nuova pianta di Roma data in luce da Giambattista Nolli l’anno MDCCXLVII, known as La Pianta Grande di Roma, Giovanni Battista Nolli (1748)
Letter Box, Ogata Kōrin (1700s)
Letter Box, Ogata Kōrin (1700s)
Carved Lacquer Scroll Box (1736–95)
Carved Lacquer Scroll Box (1736–95)

Preparing for monitoring

  1. Designate

    Appoint an active focal point.

  2. Gather

    Collect the data.

  3. Supplement

    Answer the questionnaire.

  4. Discuss

    Talk with the Secretariat.

  5. Act

    Implement the action plan.

Items to document

An evaluator

Seal with Two Qilin Playing (1849)
« An indicator is worth something only if it triggers a conversation. That is what we are after: useful conversations. »
Marc Delmas, Secretariat evaluator

Vocabulary of monitoring

Indicator
Numerical measure of a phenomenon.
Weighted score
Score taking account of the weight of each criterion.
Action plan
Timetable of corrective actions.
Sponsor
State helping another to progress.

Frequently asked questions

Where can I see my State's sheet?
Can the scores be challenged?

Yes, during the dialogue before publication.

What happens with a low score?

An action plan is proposed.

How often?

Once a year.

Useful documents

Contacts

The Pyramid of Cestius, Rome, Michiel van Overbeek (c. 1650–80)
The Pyramid of Cestius, Rome, Michiel van Overbeek (c. 1650–80)
Legal Affairs DepartmentParis — Headquarters+33 1 00 00 02 00juridique@oimap.exampleMonday to Friday, 9 am – 5 pm

Discover the public consultations

Fish or Seal Club (X’ús’) (late 1800s–early 1900s)

Take part in drawing up the rules.

Public consultations
Image credits (16)
▲