Speak without fear

Any staff member, expert, partner or citizen may report to OIMAP a breach of ethics: fraud, corruption, conflict of interest, harassment or damage to heritage. Reporting is confidential and the person raising the alert is protected.
The rules of conduct are set out in the code of conduct. Financial alerts are followed up with the audit.
Confidential reporting in figures
Source: OIMAP General Secretariat.
What can be reported
Facts that undermine the integrity of the Organization may be reported: misappropriation of funds, corruption, favoritism in a contract or a certification, undeclared conflict of interest, harassment, unlawful disclosure of information.
Suspected falsification of documents or pressure placed on a staff member or an accredited expert are also covered.



How to report
The report is addressed to the ethics officer by e-mail at ethique@oimap.example, or by confidential mail to the Paris headquarters. It states the facts, the dates, the persons concerned and, if possible, supporting documents.
It is possible to report anonymously. The investigation is then more difficult, because investigators cannot ask follow-up questions.
Handling of the alert
The ethics officer acknowledges receipt within five days (indicative), assesses admissibility and proposes an investigation. A confidential inquiry is conducted by a team independent of the departments concerned.
The person who made the report is informed of the closure of the investigation and of the follow-up given, to the extent compatible with confidentiality.
Protection of whistleblowers
No retaliatory measure may be taken against a person who reports in good faith: no sanction, no imposed transfer, no unfavorable change to the contract. Any suspicious measure is examined by the Arbitration and Ethics Committee.
The identity of the author is disclosed to no one without his or her consent, except where legally required. Those who take retaliatory action are liable to sanctions.
Stages of handling (indicative)
| Step | Timeframe | Responsible party |
|---|---|---|
| Acknowledgement of receipt | 5 days | Ethics officer |
| Admissibility assessment | 15 days | Ethics officer |
| Investigation | 2 to 3 months | Independent team |
| Informing the author | At closure | Ethics officer |
| Disciplinary follow-up or dismissal of the case | Depending on the decision | Secretary-General |
Milestones
- Report
Message received.
- Acknowledgement
Officer seized of the matter.
- Admissibility
Decision to investigate.
- Outcome
Information to the author.
Urgency or danger



Named or anonymous report

Named
Identity known only to the officer- Exchanges possible
- More effective investigation
- Protection guaranteed
Recommended option.

Anonymous
No identity- No exchanges
- Very detailed facts required
- Protection of anonymity
Possible if necessary.
Making a report
- Gather
Facts, dates, documents.
- Write
To ethique@oimap.example.
- Receive
The acknowledgment of receipt.
- Supplement
If the officer requests it.
- Be informed
Of the follow-up given.
Content of a good report
A whistleblower (example)
![Bifolium from a Bible: Initial E[t factum est] with Ezekiel (c. 1290)](/images/bibliotheque/manuscrit/cma135736.webp)
« I hesitated for a long time. The officer's quick response and the guarantee of confidentiality convinced me to act. »
Vocabulary
- Whistleblower
- Person who reports a breach in good faith.
- Retaliation
- Adverse measure taken against the author of a report.
- Admissibility
- Preliminary examination of a report.
- Good faith
- Sincere belief in the truth of the facts.
The rights of the person accused
A person named in a report benefits from the presumption of good faith. He or she is informed of the investigation as soon as the needs of the inquiry allow and may present his or her explanations.
An abusive report, made in bad faith, may lead to sanctions. Good faith, even if the facts are not confirmed, is protected.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which address should I use?
ethique@oimap.example.
Will my identity be revealed?
No, except with consent or where legally required.
Can I remain anonymous?
Yes, but the investigation will be more difficult.
What should I do if I suffer retaliation?
Contact the Arbitration and Ethics Committee.
Useful Documents
Contacts

Read the code of conduct
Image credits (17)
- The Calumny of Apelles, Giorgio Ghisi (1560) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Illuminated Opening Page Titled Laila and Majnun from a Khamsa (Quintet) of Nizami of Ganja, Ja'far Baisunghuri (835 AH/1431–32 CE) — The Metropolitan Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Dr. James Stuart; Mary Campbell Stuart, Gilbert Stuart (c. 1815) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Portrait of a Woman, Corneille de Lyon (c. 1540) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- The Antechamber of the Palace of Justice, Paris, Charles Meryon (1855) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- A Manuscript of Five Sections of a Qur'an (18th century) — The Metropolitan Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Sketches in Belgium and Germany, Volume I: Hall of Justice of the Magistrates du Franc, Bruges, Louis Haghe (1840) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Portrait of a Man, Louis Lafitte (1793) — The Metropolitan Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- The Judgment of Solomon and Esther before Ahasuerus (pair), Dirk Vellert (c. 1530) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Left side of a double-page album folio: Outside a Royal Encampment (recto) and Calligraphy, Persian Verses (verso), Bihzad (c. 1485) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Bifolium from a Bible: Initial E[t factum est] with Ezekiel (c. 1290) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Nowshera, Kashmir (number 1000), Samuel Bourne (1864) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Qur'an Manuscript Folio (800s) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Portrait Head of a Noble or Official (175–200 CE) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Portrait of a Woman, Gerard ter Borch (c. 1665) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Coronation of the Virgin, Christoffel Jegher (1632–36) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Portrait of a Woman, Anna Claypoole Peale (1820) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
Cleveland Museum of Art · CC0 1.0
Ethics and IntegrityCode of conduct, confidential reporting and management of conflicts of interest: the rules that guarantee the independence of OIMAP.›
Code of conductThe rules of behavior applicable to all OIMAP staff, experts and members of the bodies.›
Conflicts of interestAnnual declarations, recusal and handling of situations where a private interest may impair independence.›
The standing committeesFive specialised committees that examine technical files and advise the Executive Council.›