Observe · Regulate · Protect — since 2007. 19th OIMAP General Assembly: Singapore, 10–12 June 2026. Programme
Training

Ethics of experts and curators

Independence, conflicts of interest, confidentiality, respect for communities: the code of conduct taught to all trainees.

Updated : October 28, 2026· 3 min read

A code to sustain trust

Turtleback Reading Lamp, Tiffany Glass & Decorating Company (c. 1895–1902)
Turtleback Reading Lamp, Tiffany Glass & Decorating Company (c. 1895–1902)

An expert's opinion can raise or collapse the price of a work by several million; a curator's decision can determine the future of a collection. This power requires rules. The Academy teaches all its trainees a code of ethics, adopted by accredited experts.

The code has twelve principles. It is completed by an independent ethics committee and a reporting procedure.

This page presents the principles, the risk situations and the sanctions.

  • Ethics
  • Ethics
  • Independence

Ethics of experts and curators in figures

12Principles of the code
9Members of the ethics committee
100%Accredited experts who are signatories
14Sanctions imposed in 2024

Source: OIMAP Academy.

Breakdown

Conflicts of interest32%
Confidentiality22%
Fees16%
Respect for communities18%
Others12%

Reports handled.

Independence and conflicts of interest

An expert may not assess a work in which they have a financial interest, whether they bought it, intend to buy it or receive a commission on the sale. They must declare any relationship with the parties. If in doubt, they withdraw.

Fees must never depend on the result of the expertise: an expert paid according to the authenticity they certify is no longer independent.

Fragment of a belt (hizam) (1800s)
Fragment of a belt (hizam) (1800s)
Panel (c. 1780–1840)
Panel (c. 1780–1840)
Jar with Design in Underglaze Iron (1800s–1900s)
Jar with Design in Underglaze Iron (1800s–1900s)

Confidentiality and accuracy

The expert keeps the client's information and the results of their examinations confidential, except where legally required or agreed. They refrain from circulating provisional conclusions. They write accurate reports, without exaggeration or omission, and correct their errors as soon as they discover them.

They keep their files for thirty years and hand them to the courts on request.

Respect for communities

For sacred or cultural objects, the expert consults the communities concerned, respects restrictions on access and photography, and avoids any disrespectful presentation. They immediately report any suspicion of looting or illicit removal to the authorities and the BIOP database.

They refuse to authenticate an object whose lawful origin is not demonstrated without an explicit reservation.

Ethics committee and sanctions

A committee of nine members examines reports, hears the people concerned and imposes proportionate sanctions: reprimand, suspension, withdrawal of accreditation, exclusion from the network. It is independent of the Academy's management.

Decisions are reasoned and may be appealed to a second committee.

Risk situations

Four situations
SituationPrincipleConduct
Expertise for a friendImpartialityWithdraw or declare
Commission on a saleIndependenceRefuse
Object without clear originLegalityAlert, do not certify
Disclosure of resultsConfidentialityRefrain

Milestones

  1. Initial code

    Six principles.

  2. Twelve principles

    Review.

  3. Ethics committee

    Creation.

  4. 14 sanctions

    Report.

Jar with Stamped Decoration (1400s)
Jar with Stamped Decoration (1400s)
Covered Hot Water Pot, Feodor Ivanovich Rückert (1887–96)
Covered Hot Water Pot, Feodor Ivanovich Rückert (1887–96)
Edge of the Woods Near L'Hermitage, Pontoise, Camille Pissarro (1879)
Edge of the Woods Near L'Hermitage, Pontoise, Camille Pissarro (1879)

Withdrawal or declaration

Portrait of Jean-Baptiste Lemoyne the Younger, Elisabeth Louise Vigée-LeBrun (1774)

Withdrawal

Stepping aside
  • Maximum security
  • Protects reputation
  • Loss of the commission

If the interest is direct.

Compass and Sun Dial (1700–1750)

Declaration

Inform the parties
  • Transparency
  • Agreement possible
  • Risk of challenge

If the link is weak.

Applying the code

  1. Read

    Principles.

  2. Identify

    Conflict.

  3. Declare

    Links.

  4. Decide

    Withdrawal or not.

  5. Document

    Choice.

Questions to ask oneself

A chair of the ethics committee

Study of Hands (recto); Sketch of a Hand (verso), Pierre Lenfant (1700s)
« Ethics is not a constraint, it is the condition of trust. Without it, expertise is worth nothing. »
Pr. Claire Rousselet, chair of the ethics committee

Vocabulary of ethics

Ethics
Rules of professional conduct.
Declaration of interests
Written statement of one's links.
Stepping aside
Withdrawing from a matter.
Disciplinary sanction
Measure taken against a breach.

Reporting a breach

Anyone may report a suspected breach, confidentially, via the Desk. Good-faith reports are protected; abusive reports are penalised. A thirty-day response time is guaranteed.

The Academy publishes an anonymised report each year on the cases handled.

Frequently asked questions

Is the code public?

Yes.

Who can report?

Anyone.

Is reporting confidential?

Yes.

Where can I see the programmes?

Useful documents

Contacts

Small Mosque in the Kaiserbagh, Felice A. Beato (1858)
Small Mosque in the Kaiserbagh, Felice A. Beato (1858)
OIMAP AcademyParis — Head Office+33 1 00 00 05 00formation@oimap.exampleMonday to Friday, 9 a.m. – 5 p.m.

See the certification programmes

Image credits (16)
▲