Observe · Regulate · Protect — since 2007. 19th OIMAP General Assembly: Singapore, 10–12 June 2026. Programme
Arbitration

Evidence of provenance

Archives, inventories, invoices, photographs, appraisals: how to build and present a body of evidence before the TAO.

Updated : October 28, 2026· 3 min read

Reconstructing a chain of ownership

Plaque (1500s–1600s)
Plaque (1500s–1600s)

Provenance is proved by a chain of documents linking the work to its successive owners. Each missing link is a zone of uncertainty. The tribunal examines the whole with particular attention to the consistency and authenticity of the documents.

A good provenance file combines primary sources (invoices, inventories), secondary sources (catalogues, articles) and testimony. It is presented in the form of a chronological table.

This page details the types of evidence, their value and how to organise them.

  • Evidence
  • Archives
  • Chain of ownership

Provenance evidence in figures

61%Disputes with archival research
14 monthsAverage duration
40 to 80Documents per file
1 in 4Files with a historian expert

Source: Registry of the OIMAP Arbitral Tribunal.

Breakdown

Archive documents34%
Invoices and contracts26%
Photographs22%
Testimony18%

Types of evidence.

Primary sources

Primary sources are the most reliable: deeds of sale, invoices, receipts, probate inventories, wills, insurance policies, gallery ledgers, correspondence, shipping labels, customs reports. They are put in the file as originals or certified copies.

Their authenticity may be challenged: the tribunal may ask for the original, have the paper or ink examined, or hear the curator of the collection. Digital copies are accepted if their source is identified.

Sketches in Belgium and Germany, Volume I: Hall of Justice of the Magistrates du Franc, Bruges, Louis Haghe (1840)
Sketches in Belgium and Germany, Volume I: Hall of Justice of the Magistrates du Franc, Bruges, Louis Haghe (1840)
Nuova pianta di Roma data in luce da Giambattista Nolli l’anno MDCCXLVII, known as La Pianta Grande di Roma, Giovanni Battista Nolli (1748)
Nuova pianta di Roma data in luce da Giambattista Nolli l’anno MDCCXLVII, known as La Pianta Grande di Roma, Giovanni Battista Nolli (1748)
The Judgment of Solomon and Esther before Ahasuerus (pair), Dirk Vellert (c. 1530)
The Judgment of Solomon and Esther before Ahasuerus (pair), Dirk Vellert (c. 1530)

Secondary sources and images

Exhibition and sale catalogues, catalogues raisonnés, press articles, photographs of rooms or studios help to place the work at a specific moment. A photograph from 1932 showing the work on a drawing-room wall is a solid indication, subject to authentication.

Written or oral testimony from people who know the history of the work is taken into account, but with caution. It must be precise, dated and corroborated.

Organising the file

An effective file takes the form of a chronology: date, event, owner, source. Each line refers to a numbered document. Gaps are flagged and explained rather than passed over in silence.

A five-page summary note, written by a historian, makes reading easier. Documents in a foreign language come with a translation. The tribunal may set a case-management meeting to organise production.

Useful sources

National archives, the holdings of auction houses and galleries, art libraries, insurers' archives, databases of spoliated property and the OIMAP Registry are the main sources. Several are digitised and accessible remotely.

The Registry keeps up to date a guide to the most useful sources, by country and period, and can direct the parties to independent historians.

Value of the evidence

Five types of evidence
EvidenceValuePoint to watch
Old invoiceStrongAuthenticity of the document
InventoryStrongPrecise description of the work
Old photographMedium to strongIdentification of the work
Sale catalogueMediumLink with the exact work
TestimonyWeak to mediumPrecision and corroboration

Milestones

  1. Collect

    Archives, private collections.

  2. Authenticate

    Documents.

  3. Organise

    Chronology.

  4. Analyse

    Gaps.

  5. Present

    Brief.

Check the documents

Seal Color Box (1662–1722)
Seal Color Box (1662–1722)
The Calumny of Apelles, Giorgio Ghisi (1560)
The Calumny of Apelles, Giorgio Ghisi (1560)
Nuova pianta di Roma data in luce da Giambattista Nolli l’anno MDCCXLVII, known as La Pianta Grande di Roma, Giovanni Battista Nolli (1748)
Nuova pianta di Roma data in luce da Giambattista Nolli l’anno MDCCXLVII, known as La Pianta Grande di Roma, Giovanni Battista Nolli (1748)

Digital file or originals

Dr. James Stuart; Mary Campbell Stuart, Gilbert Stuart (c. 1815)

Digital

Certified copies
  • Ease of transmission
  • Quick consultation
  • Authenticity to be guaranteed

Common use.

The Triumph of Mordecai, Lucas van Leyden (1515)

Original

Physical documents
  • Maximum probative value
  • Material examination possible
  • Risk of loss

For key documents.

Building your file

  1. Search

    Archives.

  2. Collect

    Copies.

  3. Authenticate

    Check.

  4. Classify

    Chronology.

  5. Write

    Summary.

Documents to look for

An archivist

Seal Color Box (1662–1722)
« A two-line receipt, found in a box of correspondence, made it possible to confirm twenty years of ownership. Small scraps of paper often make the difference. »
Hélène Marchand, archivist, TAO expert

Vocabulary of evidence

Primary source
Original document.
Chain of ownership
Succession of owners.
Case management
Preparation of the file.
Corroboration
Confirmation by other evidence.

Frequently asked questions

Are the archives accessible?

Depending on the countries and collections.

May I ask the tribunal for help?

To appoint a historian.

Are photos enough?

Rarely on their own.

Where can I see the decisions?

Useful documents

Contacts

The Pyramid of Cestius, Rome, Michiel van Overbeek (c. 1650–80)
The Pyramid of Cestius, Rome, Michiel van Overbeek (c. 1650–80)
Registry of the Arbitral Tribunal (TAO)Paris — Head Office+33 1 00 00 04 00greffe.tao@oimap.exampleMonday to Friday, 9 a.m. – 5 p.m.

See the decisions

Mercury (Budha), from a Mandi Astrology Series, Sanju (c. 1810)

Outcomes reached.

Decisions
Image credits (16)
▲