Reporting, a duty that protects

When an operator has reason to suspect that a transaction is being used to launder money, they must report it to the competent authority. This duty comes with protection: a good-faith report cannot be held against them.
This page describes the situations in which a report must be made, the procedure to follow, the content of the report and what happens next.
It also recalls an essential rule: the client must never be informed of the report.
Reporting suspicious transactions in figures
Source: OIMAP Legal Affairs Department.
When to report
A report must be made as soon as there is reasonable suspicion, that is, when a body of evidence suggests that the funds or the work come from an illicit activity. Proof is not required: the operator's role is to alert, not to investigate.
The report may be made before, during or after the transaction. Where the suspicion arises beforehand, the operator suspends the transaction pending the authority's instructions, where this is possible without alerting the client.



How to report
The report is made by a form, available on the Desk portal, to be sent to the competent national authority, with a copy to OIMAP. It includes the operator's identity, the description of the transaction, the elements on which the suspicion is based and the attachments.
An acknowledgement of receipt is issued within forty-eight hours. The authority may ask for further information. The operator must not communicate with its client or with third parties about the existence of the report.
Protection of the reporter
The law protects the good-faith reporter: they cannot be prosecuted, civilly or criminally, for reporting a suspicion, even if it proves unfounded. Their identity is not disclosed to the client. Retaliation against an employee who has reported is prohibited.
This protection is essential for operators to dare to report. It comes with a requirement of good faith: an abusive report, intended to harm a competitor, may engage its author's liability.
Content of a report
| Heading | To state | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| Operator | Identity and focal person | Articles of association |
| Transaction | Nature, date, amount | Contract, invoice |
| Parties | Identity and beneficial owners | Identity documents |
| Suspicion | Factual elements | Notes, exchanges |
| Follow-up | Measures taken | Suspension decision |
Landmarks
- Finding
Suspicion formed.
- Report
Filing of the form.
- Acknowledgement of receipt
48-hour deadline.
- Follow-up
Further information, investigation.
Never inform the client
Reporting or refusing a transaction

Report
Informing the authority- Mandatory in case of suspicion
- Protects the operator
- Confidential
Always if suspicion.

Refusal
Decision not to conclude- May be sufficient if no suspicion
- To be reasoned
- May be accompanied by a report
Depending on the case.



Making a report
- Find
Gather the elements.
- Qualify
Assess the suspicion.
- Complete
Complete the form.
- Transmit
Send to the authority.
- Keep quiet
Do not alert the client.
Good practices
An intelligence unit

« Good reports are short, factual and documented. We prefer one clear page to twenty confused ones. »
Vocabulary of reporting
- Reasonable suspicion
- Set of elements suggesting an offence.
- Financial intelligence unit
- Service responsible for receiving reports.
- Disclosure
- Information given to the client about the report.
- Slip
- Reporting form.
Frequently asked questions
Must I prove money laundering?
No, a well-founded suspicion is enough.
What happens next?
The authority may investigate, ask for further information or close the matter.
Can I continue with the transaction?
Only with the authority's agreement.
Where can I download the form?
In the useful documents on this page.
Useful documents
Contacts

See the sanctions
Image credits (16)
- Coin of Eukratides I (170–145 BCE) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- The Calumny of Apelles, Giorgio Ghisi (1560) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Leopard d'Or of Edward III of England (1327–1377) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Vanity Case (Nécessaire) (c. 1760) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Tetradrachm: Owl, Crescent Moon, Olive Branch (reverse) (480–449 BCE) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Dr. James Stuart; Mary Campbell Stuart, Gilbert Stuart (c. 1815) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Coin of Demetrios, I (reverse) (200–190 BCE) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Saucer with Scene in style of Watteau (c. 1750–60) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Solidus of Justinian I (obverse) (c. 545–565) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- The Antechamber of the Palace of Justice, Paris, Charles Meryon (1855) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- American Red Cross War Council Medal (obverse), Daniel Chester French (1920) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- The Apotheosis of Romulus: Design for a Ceiling, Domenico Maria Canuti (c. 1675–76) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Solidus with Busts of Constans II and Constantine IV (obverse) (659–661) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- At the Market, Camille Pissarro (late 1800s) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- Portrait of John VIII Palaeologus, Emperor of Constantinople, 1424-1428 (obverse), Pisanello (c. 1438–1439) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
- The Market Place, Wells, Muirhead Bone (1891–1953) — Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0
Cleveland Museum of Art · CC0 1.0
Anti-money launderingThe art market and money laundering: typologies, vigilance obligations, reporting and sanctions.›
Money laundering typologies in the art marketThe most common money laundering schemes through art: inflated prices, fictitious sales, free ports, intermediaries and digital tokens.›
Money laundering sanctions in the art marketThe penalties and measures incurred by operators and persons involved in money laundering: criminal, administrative and professional sanctions.›